Genetic and phenotypic correlations between performance traits with meat quality and carcass characteristics in commercial crossbred pigs
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 9, Issue: 10, Page: e110105
2014
- 51Citations
- 85Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations51
- Citation Indexes51
- 51
- CrossRef20
- Captures85
- Readers85
- 85
Article Description
Genetic correlations between performance traits with meat quality and carcass traits were estimated on 6,408 commercial crossbred pigs with performance traits recorded in production systems with 2,100 of them having meat quality and carcass measurements. Significant fixed effects (company, sex and batch), covariates (birth weight, cold carcass weight, and age), random effects (additive, litter and maternal) were fitted in the statistical models. A series of pairwise bivariate analyses were implemented in ASREML to estimate heritability, phenotypic, and genetic correlations between performance traits (n = 9) with meat quality (n = 25) and carcass (n = 19) traits. The animals had a pedigree compromised of 9,439 animals over 15 generations. Performance traits had low-to-moderate heritabilities (6SE), ranged from 0.0760.13 to 0.4560.07 for weaning weight, and ultrasound backfat depth, respectively. Genetic correlations between performance and carcass traits were moderate to high. The results indicate that: (a) selection for birth weight may increase drip loss, lightness of longissimus dorsi, and gluteus medius muscles but may reduce fat depth; (b) selection for nursery weight can be valuable for increasing both quantity and quality traits; (c) selection for increased daily gain may increase the carcass weight and most of the primal cuts. These findings suggest that deterioration of pork quality may have occurred over many generations through the selection for less backfat thickness, and feed efficiency, but selection for growth had no adverse effects on pork quality. Low-to-moderate heritabilities for performance traits indicate that they could be improved using traditional selection or genomic selection. The estimated genetic parameters for performance, carcass and meat quality traits may be incorporated into the breeding programs that emphasize product quality in these Canadian swine populations.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0110105; 10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t007; 10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t006; 10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84908701503&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25350845; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t007; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0110105; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t007; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t004; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0110105&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0110105; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0110105; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0110105&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t007; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0110105; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.t002
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know