Ten-year cumulative incidence of diabetic retinopathy. The beijing eye study 2001/2011
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 9, Issue: 10, Page: e111320
2014
- 63Citations
- 54Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations63
- Citation Indexes61
- 61
- CrossRef19
- Policy Citations2
- 2
- Captures54
- Readers54
- 54
Article Description
Objective: To assess the cumulative 10-year incidence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and its associated factors in a population living in Greater Beijing. Methods: The population-based longitudinal Beijing Eye Study, which included 4439 subjects (age in 2001: 40+years) in 2001, was repeated in 2011 with 2695 subjects participating (66.4% of the survivors). The study participants underwent a detailed ophthalmic examination. Fundus photographs were examined for the new development of DR. Results: After excluding individuals with DR at baseline (n=87) or no sufficient fundus photographs in 2011 (n= 6), the study included 2602 subjects with a mean age of 64.669.7 years (median: 64.0 years; range: 50 to 93 years). In the 10-year period, 109 subjects (39 men) developed new DR with an incidence of 4.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.45,5.03). In multiple logistic regression analysis, incident DR was significantly associated with higher HbA1c value (P<0.001; Odds Ratio (OR): 1.73; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.35,2.21), longer duration of diabetes mellitus (P<0.001; OR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.10,1.22), higher serum concentration of creatinine (P = 0.02; OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.002,1.022), lower educational level (P = 0.049; OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.55,0.99), higher estimated cerebrospinal fluid pressure (P = 0.038; OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.01,1.22), and shorter axial length (P<0.001; OR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.33,0.71). Conclusions: The cumulative 10-year incidence (mean: 4.2%) of DR in a North Chinese population was significantly associated with a higher HbA1c value, longer known duration of diabetes mellitus, higher estimated CSFP and shorter axial length (P<0.001). Shorter axial length (or hyperopia) and, potentially, higher CSFP may be additional risk factors to be taken into account when counseling and treating patients with diabetes mellitus.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84908636859&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111320; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25347072; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111320.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111320.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111320.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111320.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111320; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111320.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111320.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111320; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111320; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111320.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111320.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111320.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111320&type=printable; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0111320; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111320&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111320; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0111320; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111320.t001; http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0111320; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111320; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111320
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know