Monitoring brain tumor vascular heamodynamic following anti-angiogenic therapy with advanced magnetic resonance imaging in mice
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 9, Issue: 12, Page: e115093
2014
- 9Citations
- 27Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef6
- Captures27
- Readers27
- 27
Article Description
Advanced MR imaging methods have an essential role in classification, grading, follow-up and therapeutic management in patients with brain tumors. With the introduction of new therapeutic options, the challenge for better tissue characterization and diagnosis increase, calling for new reliable non-invasive imaging methods. In the current study we evaluated the added value of a combined protocol of blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) imaging during hyperoxic challenge (termed hemodynamic response imaging (HRI)) in an orthotopic mouse model for glioblastoma under anti-angiogenic treatment with B20-4.1.1, an anti-VEGF antibody. In glioblastoma tumors, the elevated HRI indicated progressive angiogenesis as further confirmed by histology. In the current glioblastoma model, B20-treatment caused delayed tumor progression with no significant changes in HRI yet with slightly reduced tumor vascularity as indicated by histology. Furthermore, fewer apoptotic cells and higher proliferation index were detected in the B20-treated tumors compared to control-treated tumors. In conclusion, HRI provides an easy, safe and contrast agent free method for the assessment of the brain hemodynamic function, an additionally important clinical information.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0115093; 10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g004
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84918588000&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115093; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25506833; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115093; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115093; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0115093; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0115093; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0115093&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g003; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0115093; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0115093; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115093.g004; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0115093; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0115093&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115093
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know