Proliferation and differentiation of Trypanosoma cruzi inside its vector have a new trigger: Redox status
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 10, Issue: 2, Page: e0116712
2015
- 73Citations
- 159Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations73
- Citation Indexes73
- 73
- CrossRef55
- Captures159
- Readers159
- 159
Article Description
Trypanosoma cruzi proliferate and differentiate inside different compartments of triatomines gut that is the first environment encountered by T. cruzi. Due to its complex life cycle, the parasite is constantly exposed to reactive oxygen species (ROS). We tested the influence of the pro-oxidant molecules H2O2 and the superoxide generator, Paraquat, as well as, metabolism products of the vector, with distinct redox status, in the proliferation and metacyclogenesis. These molecules are heme, hemozoin and urate. We also tested the antioxidants NAC and GSH. Heme induced the proliferation of epimastigotes and impaired the metacyclogenesis. β-hematin, did not affect epimastigote proliferation but decreased parasite differentiation. Conversely, we show that urate, GSH and NAC dramatically impaired epimastigote proliferation and during metacyclogenesis, NAC and urate induced a significant increment of trypomastigotes and decreased the percentage of epimastigotes. We also quantified the parasite loads in the anterior and posterior midguts and in the rectum of the vector by qPCR. The treatment with the antioxidants increased the parasite loads in all midgut sections analyzed. In vivo, the group of vectors fed with reduced molecules showed an increment of trypomastigotes and decreased epimastigotes when analyzed by differential counting. Heme stimulated proliferation by increasing the cell number in the S and G2/M phases, whereas NAC arrested epimastigotes in G1 phase. NAC greatly increased the percentage of trypomastigotes. Taken together, these data show a shift in the triatomine gut microenvironment caused by the redox status may also influence T. cruzi biology inside the vector. In this scenario, oxidants act to turn on epimastigote proliferation while antioxidants seem to switch the cycle towards metacyclogenesis. This is a new insight that defines a key role for redox metabolism in governing the parasitic life cycle.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0116712; 10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g006; 10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g004
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84923009187&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25671543; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0116712; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g004; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0116712; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0116712&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g003; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0116712; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g005; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0116712; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g004; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0116712&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116712.g002
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know