S-adenosyl-L-methionine for the treatment of chronic liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 10, Issue: 3, Page: e0122124
2015
- 62Citations
- 99Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations62
- Citation Indexes62
- 62
- CrossRef17
- Captures99
- Readers99
- 99
- Mentions2
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent Blog
SAM-e: Worth the Hype or Waste of Money?
Have you heard the hype about SAM-e? It’s a dietary supplement that has been on the U.S. market for only 20 years, long after it
Most Recent News
SAMe supplements and depression: Can they really help?
Because some of us like to opt for more “natural” treatments before we hit the hard stuff, there are hundreds of supplements out there claiming
Article Description
It has been well established that S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe) is the principal methyl donor in methyltransferase reactions and that SAMe supplementation restores hepatic glutathione (GSH) deposits and attenuates liver injury. However, the effectiveness of SAMe therapy in chronic liver disease has not been adequately addressed. We searched globally recognized electronic databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Database and EMBASE, to retrieve relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of chronic liver disease published in the past 20 years. We then performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the enrolled trials that met the inclusion criteria.The results showed that twelve RCTs from 11 studies, which examined 705 patients, were included in this research. For liver function, certain results obtained from data synthesis and independent comparisons demonstrated significant differences between the levels of total bilirubin (TBIL) and aspartate transaminase (AST). However, no studies identified significant differences regarding alanine transaminase (ALT) levels. An analysis of the adverse events and long-term prognosis also indicated no significant differences between the SAMe and the placebo groups. In a subgroup analysis of gravidas and children, several of the included data indicated that there was a significant difference in the pruritus score. Furthermore, the results regarding ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and stronger neo-minophagen C (SNMC) indicated that both treatments were more effective than SAMe was in certain chronic liver diseases. These findings suggest that SAMe could be used as the basis of a medication regimen for liver function improvement because of its safety. However, SAMe also demonstrated limited clinical value in the treatment of certain chronic liver diseases.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0122124; 10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84924960060&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25774783; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0122124; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g003; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0122124; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0122124&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0122124; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0122124&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g004; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0122124; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122124.g001
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know