The SNP rs931794 in 15q25.1 is associated with lung cancer risk: A hospital-based case-control study and meta-analysis
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 10, Issue: 6, Page: e0128201
2015
- 4Citations
- 26Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- CrossRef1
- Captures26
- Readers26
- 26
Article Description
Background Lung cancer is one of the most common human malignant diseases and the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The rs931794, a SNP located in 15q25.1, has been suggested to be associated with lung cancer risk. Nevertheless, several genetic association studies yielded controversial results. Methods and Findings A hospital-based case-control study involving 611 cases and 1062 controls revealed the variant of rs931794 was related to increased lung cancer risk. Stratified analyses revealed the G allele was significantly associated with lung cancer risk among smokers. Following meta-analysis including 6616 cases and 7697 controls confirmed the relevance of rs931794 variant with increased lung cancer risk once again. Heterogeneity should be taken into account when interpreting the consequences. Stratified analysis found ethnicity, histological type and genotyping method were not the sources of between-study heterogeneity. Further sensitivity analysis revealed that the study "Hsiung et al (2010)" might be the major contributor to heterogeneity. Cumulative meta-analysis showed the trend was increasingly obvious with adding studies, confirming the significant association. Conclusions Results from our current case-control study and meta-analysis offered insight of association between rs931794 and lung cancer risk, suggesting the variant of rs931794 might be related with increased lung cancer risk.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0128201; 10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84937850001&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26079375; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0128201; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0128201&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0128201; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.t004; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0128201; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0128201&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128201.g003; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0128201
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know