Impairment of colour vision in diabetes with no retinopathy: Sankara Nethralaya Diabetic Retinopathy Epidemiology and Molecular Genetics Study (SNDREAMS- II, Report 3)
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 10, Issue: 6, Page: e0129391
2015
- 30Citations
- 67Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations30
- Citation Indexes30
- 30
- CrossRef5
- Captures67
- Readers67
- 67
Article Description
Purpose: To assess impairment of colour vision in type 2 diabetics with no diabetic retinopathy and elucidate associated risk factors in a population-based cross-sectional study. Methods: This is part of Sankara Nethralaya Diabetic Retinopathy Epidemiology and Molecular-genetics Study (SN-DREAMS II) which was conducted between 2007-2010. FM 100 hue-test was performed in 253 subjects with no clinical evidence of diabetic retinopathy. All subjects underwent detailed ophthalmic evaluation including cataract grading using LOCS III and 45° 4-field stereoscopic fundus photography. Various ocular and systemic risk factors for impairment of colour vision (ICV) were assessed in subjects with diabetes but no retinopathy. P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean age of the study sample was 57.08 ± 9.21 (range: 44-86 years). Gender adjusted prevalence of ICV among subjects with diabetes with no retinopathy was 39.5% (CI: 33.5- 45.5). The mean total error score in the study sample was 197.77 ± 100 (range: 19-583). The risk factors for ICV in the study were women OR: 1.79 (1.00-3.18), increased resting heart rate OR: 1.04 (1.01-1.07) and increased intraocular pressure OR: 1.12 (1.00-1.24). Significant protective factor was serum high-density lipoprotein OR: 0.96 (0.93-0.99). Conclusions: Acquired ICV is an early indicator of neurodegenerative changes in the retina. ICV found in diabetic subjects without retinopathy may be of non-vascular etiology.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0129391; 10.1371/journal.pone.0129391.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0129391.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0129391.t003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84936797755&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129391; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26053017; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129391.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129391.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129391.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129391.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129391; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129391.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129391.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129391.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129391.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129391; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129391; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129391.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129391.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129391.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129391.t002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129391; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129391&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129391.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129391; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0129391; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0129391; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129391&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129391.t003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129391.t002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129391
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know