Reading from a head-fixed display during walking: Adverse effects of gaze stabilization mechanisms
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 10, Issue: 6, Page: e0129902
2015
- 15Citations
- 39Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations15
- Citation Indexes15
- 15
- CrossRef3
- Captures39
- Readers39
- 39
Article Description
Reading performance during standing and walking was assessed for information presented on earth-fixed and head-fixed displays by determining the minimal duration during which a numerical time stimulus needed to be presented for 50% correct naming answers. Reading from the earth-fixed display was comparable during standing and walking, with optimal performance being attained for visual character sizes in the range of 0.2° to 1°. Reading from the head-fixed display was impaired for small (0.2-0.3°) and large (5°) visual character sizes, especially during walking. Analysis of head and eye movements demonstrated that retinal slip was larger during walking than during standing, but remained within the functional acuity range when reading from the earth-fixed display. The detrimental effects on performance of reading from the head-fixed display during walking could be attributed to loss of acuity resulting from large retinal slip. Because walking activated the angular vestibulo-ocular reflex, the resulting compensatory eye movements acted to stabilize gaze on the information presented on the earth-fixed display but destabilized gaze from the information presented on the head-fixed display. We conclude that the gaze stabilization mechanisms that normally allow visual performance to be maintained during physical activity adversely affect reading performance when the information is presented on a display attached to the head.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0129902; 10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g005
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84935507381&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26053622; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129902; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g004; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129902; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129902&type=printable; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129902&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129902; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0129902
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know