Efficient modeling of MS/MS data for metabolic flux analysis
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 10, Issue: 7, Page: e0130213
2015
- 15Citations
- 45Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations15
- Citation Indexes15
- 15
- CrossRef3
- Captures45
- Readers45
- 45
Article Description
Metabolic flux analysis (MFA) is a widely used method for quantifying intracellular metabolic fluxes. It works by feeding cells with isotopic labeled nutrients, measuring metabolite isotopic labeling, and computationally interpreting the measured labeling data to estimate flux. Tandem mass-spectrometry (MS/MS) has been shown to be useful for MFA, providing positional isotopic labeling data. Specifically, MS/MS enables the measurement of a metabolite tandem mass-isotopomer distribution, representing the abundance in which certain parent and product fragments of a metabolite have different number of labeled atoms. However, a major limitation in using MFA with MS/MS data is the lack of a computationally efficient method for simulating such isotopic labeling data. Here, we describe the tandemer approach for efficiently computing metabolite tandem mass-isotopomer distributions in a metabolic network, given an estimation of metabolic fluxes. This approach can be used by MFA to find optimal metabolic fluxes, whose induced metabolite labeling patterns match tandem mass-isotopomer distributions measured by MS/MS. The tandemer approach is applied to simulate MS/MS data in a small-scale metabolic network model of mammalian methionine metabolism and in a large-scale metabolic network model of E. coli. It is shown to significantly improve the running time by between two to three orders of magnitude compared to the state-of-the-art, cumomers approach. We expect the tandemer approach to promote broader usage of MS/MS technology in metabolic flux analysis. Implementation is freely available at www.cs.technion.ac.il/~tomersh/methods.html Copyright:
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0130213; 10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g005
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84941966264&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26230524; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130213; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130213&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130213; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g003; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130213; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.t002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130213&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130213; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0130213
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know