Micro-CT technique is well suited for documentation of remodeling processes in murine carotid arteries
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 10, Issue: 6, Page: e0130374
2015
- 12Citations
- 31Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- CrossRef6
- Captures31
- Readers31
- 31
Article Description
Background: The pathomechanisms of atherosclerosis and vascular remodelling are under intense research. Only a few in vivo tools to study these processes longitudinally in animal experiments are available. Here, we evaluated the potential of micro-CT technology. Methods: Lumen areas of the common carotid arteries (CCA) in the ApoE-/- partial carotid artery ligation mouse model were compared between in vivo and ex vivo micro-CT technique and serial histology in a total of 28 animals. AuroVist-15 nm nanoparticles were used as in vivo blood pool contrast agent in a Skyscan 1176 micro-CT at resolution of 18 μmeter voxel size and a mean x-ray dose of 0.5 Gy. For ex vivo imaging, animals were perfused with MicroFil and imaged at 9 μmeter voxel size. Lumen area was evaluated at postoperative days 7, 14, and 28 first by micro-CT followed by histology. Results: In vivo micro-CT and histology revealed lumen loss starting at day 14. The lumen profile highly correlated (r = 0.79, P<0.0001) between this two methods but absolute lumen values obtained by histology were lower than those obtained by micro-CT. Comparison of in vivo and ex vivo micro-CT imaging revealed excellent correlation (r = 0.83, P<0.01). Post mortem micro-CT yielded a higher resolution than in vivo micro-CT but there was no statistical difference of lumen measurements in the partial carotid artery ligation model. Conclusion: These data demonstrate that in vivo micro-CT is a feasible and accurate technique with low animal stress to image remodeling processes in the murine carotid artery. Copyright:
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0130374; 10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g004
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84939166910&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130374; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26086218; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130374; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130374; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130374; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0130374; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130374&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130374; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0130374; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130374&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130374; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130374.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130374
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know