Mscentipede: Modeling heterogeneity across genomic sites and replicates improves accuracy in the inference of transcription factor binding
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 10, Issue: 9, Page: e0138030
2015
- 28Citations
- 117Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations28
- Citation Indexes28
- 28
- CrossRef20
- Captures117
- Readers117
- 117
Article Description
Understanding global gene regulation depends critically on accurate annotation of regulatory elements that are functional in a given cell type. CENTIPEDE, a powerful, probabilistic framework for identifying transcription factor binding sites from tissue-specific DNase I cleavage patterns and genomic sequence content, leverages the hypersensitivity of factorbound chromatin and the information in the DNase I spatial cleavage profile characteristic of each DNA binding protein to accurately infer functional factor binding sites. However, the model for the spatial profile in this framework fails to account for the substantial variation in the DNase I cleavage profiles across different binding sites. Neither does it account for variation in the profiles at the same binding site across multiple replicate DNase I experiments, which are increasingly available. In this work, we introduce new methods, based on multiscale models for inhomogeneous Poisson processes, to account for such variation in DNase I cleavage patterns both within and across binding sites. These models account for the spatial structure in the heterogeneity in DNase I cleavage patterns for each factor. Using DNase-seq measurements assayed in a lymphoblastoid cell line, we demonstrate the improved performance of this model for several transcription factors by comparing against the Chip-seq peaks for those factors. Finally, we explore the effects of DNase I sequence bias on inference of factor binding using a simple extension to our framework that allows for a more flexible background model. The proposed model can also be easily applied to paired-end ATAC-seq and DNase-seq data. msCentipede, a Python implementation of our algorithm, is available at http://rajanil.github.io/msCentipede.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0138030; 10.1371/journal.pone.0138030.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0138030.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0138030.g002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84947776702&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138030; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26406244; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138030.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138030.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138030.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138030.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138030; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138030.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138030.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138030.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138030.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138030; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138030; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138030.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138030.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138030.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138030.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138030.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138030; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138030&type=printable; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0138030; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138030&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138030; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138030.g003; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138030; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138030.g002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0138030
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know