Distinct yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) stocks detected in western and central pacific ocean (WCPO) using DNA microsatellites
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 10, Issue: 9, Page: e0138292
2015
- 13Citations
- 57Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations13
- Citation Indexes11
- 11
- CrossRef6
- Policy Citations2
- Policy Citation2
- Captures57
- Readers57
- 57
Article Description
The yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares (Bonnaterre, 1788), covers majority of the Philippines' tuna catch, one of the major fisheries commodities in the country. Due to its high economic importance sustainable management of these tunas has become an imperative measure to prevent stock depletion. Currently, the Philippine yellowfin tuna is believed to be part of a single stock of the greaterWCPO though some reports suggest otherwise. This study therefore aims to establish the genetic stock structure of the said species in the Philippines as compared to Bismarck Sea, Papua New Guinea using nine (9) DNA microsatellite markers. DNA microsatellite data revealed significant genetic differentiation between the Philippine and Bismarck Sea, Papua New Guinea yellowfin tuna samples. (FST = 0.034, P = 0.016), which is further supported by multilocus distance matrix testing (PCoA) and modelbased clustering (STRUCTURE 2.2).With these findings, this study posits that the yellowfin tuna population in the Philippines is a separate stock from the Bismarck Sea population. These findings add evidence to the alternative hypothesis of having at least 2 subpopulations of yellowfin tuna in the WCPO and calls for additional scientific studies using other parameters to investigate this. Accurate population information is necessary in formulating a more appropriate management strategy for the sustainability of the yellowfin tuna not only in the Philippines but also in the WCPO. Copyright:
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0138292; 10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84947460175&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26394234; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138292; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138292&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g001; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138292&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138292; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138292; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138292.t004; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0138292
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know