Functional status predicts acute care readmissions from inpatient rehabilitation in the stroke population
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 10, Issue: 11, Page: e0142180
2015
- 42Citations
- 38Usage
- 91Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations42
- Citation Indexes40
- 40
- CrossRef12
- Policy Citations2
- 2
- Usage38
- Downloads36
- Abstract Views2
- Captures91
- Readers91
- 91
Article Description
Objective: Acute care readmission risk is an increasingly recognized problem that has garnered significant attention, yet the reasons for acute care readmission in the inpatient rehabilitation population are complex and likely multifactorial. Information on both medical comorbidities and functional status is routinely collected for stroke patients participating in inpatient rehabilitation. We sought to determine whether functional status is a more robust predictor of acute care readmissions in the inpatient rehabilitation stroke population compared with medical comorbidities using a large, administrative data set. Methods: A retrospective analysis of data from the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation from the years 2002 to 2011 was performed examining stroke patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation facilities. A Basic Model for predicting acute care readmission risk based on age and functional status was compared with models incorporating functional status and medical comorbidities (Basic-Plus) or models including age and medical comorbidities alone (Age-Comorbidity). C-statistics were compared to evaluate model performance. Findings: There were a total of 803,124 patients: 88,187 (11%) patients were transferred back to an acute hospital: 22,247 (2.8%) within 3 days, 43,481 (5.4%) within 7 days, and 85,431 (10.6%) within 30 days. The C-statistics for the Basic Model were 0.701, 0.672, and 0.682 at days 3, 7, and 30 respectively. As compared to the Basic Model, the best-performing Basic-Plus model was the Basic+Elixhauser model with C-statistics differences of +0.011, +0.011, and + 0.012, and the best-performing Age-Comorbidity model was the Age+Elixhauser model with C-statistic differences of -0.124, -0.098, and -0.098 at days 3, 7, and 30 respectively. Conclusions: Readmission models for the inpatient rehabilitation stroke population based on functional status and age showed better predictive ability than models based on medical comorbidities.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0142180; 10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84957998654&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142180; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26599009; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142180; https://digitalcommons.daemen.edu/faculty_scholar/232; https://digitalcommons.daemen.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1232&context=faculty_scholar; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142180; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0142180; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t004; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0142180; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0142180&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0142180; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0142180; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0142180&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142180; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0142180; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142180.t001
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know