Comparative study of a real-time PCR assay targeting senX3-regX3 versus other molecular strategies commonly used in the diagnosis of tuberculosis
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 10, Issue: 11, Page: e0143025
2015
- 12Citations
- 56Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef5
- Policy Citations4
- Policy Citation4
- Captures56
- Readers56
- 56
Article Description
Background Nucleic acid amplification tests are increasingly used for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis. We undertook a comparative study of the efficiency and diagnostic yield of a real-time PCR senX3-regX3 based assay versus the classical IS6110 target and the new commercial methods. Methods This single-blind prospective comparative study included 145 consecutive samples: 76 from patients with culture-confirmed tuberculosis (86.8% pulmonary and 13.2% extrapulmonary tuberculosis: 48.7%smear-positive and 51.3%smear-negative) and 69 control samples (24 from patients diagnosed with non-tuberculous mycobacteria infections and 45 from patients with suspected tuberculosis which was eventually ruled out). All samples were tested by two CE-marked assays (Xpert®MTB/RIF and AnyplexTM plus MTB/NTM) and two in-house assays targeting senX3-regX3 and the IS6110 gene. Results The detection limit ranged from 1.00E+01 fg for Anyplex, senX3-regX3 and IS6110 to 1.00E+04 fg for Xpert. All three Xpert, senX3-regX3 and IS6110 assays detected all 37 smear-positive cases. Conversely, Anyplex was positive in 34 (91.9%) smear-positive cases. In patients with smear-negative tuberculosis, differences were observed between the assays; Xpert detected 22 (56.41%) of the 39 smear-negative samples, Anyplex 24 (61.53%), senX3-regX3 28 (71.79%) and IS6110 35 (89.74%). Xpert and senX3-regX3 were negative in all control samples; however, the false positive rate was 8.7% and 13% for Anyplex and IS6110, respectively. The overall sensitivity was 77.6%, 85.7%, 77.3% and 94.7% and the specificity was 100%, 100%, 90.8% and 87.0% for the Xpert, senX3-regX3, Anyplex and IS6110 assays, respectively. Conclusion Real-time PCR assays targeting IS6110 lack the desired specificity. The Xpert MTB/RIF and in-house senX3-regX3 assays are both sensitive and specific for the detection of MTBC in both pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples. Therefore, the real time PCR senX3-regX3 based assay could be a useful and complementary tool in the diagnosis of tuberculosis.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0143025; 10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84957572984&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26600434; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143025; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143025&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143025; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0143025; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.t002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143025&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143025; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.t003
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know