PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Comparative study of a real-time PCR assay targeting senX3-regX3 versus other molecular strategies commonly used in the diagnosis of tuberculosis

PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 10, Issue: 11, Page: e0143025
2015
  • 12
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 56
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Article Description

Background Nucleic acid amplification tests are increasingly used for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis. We undertook a comparative study of the efficiency and diagnostic yield of a real-time PCR senX3-regX3 based assay versus the classical IS6110 target and the new commercial methods. Methods This single-blind prospective comparative study included 145 consecutive samples: 76 from patients with culture-confirmed tuberculosis (86.8% pulmonary and 13.2% extrapulmonary tuberculosis: 48.7%smear-positive and 51.3%smear-negative) and 69 control samples (24 from patients diagnosed with non-tuberculous mycobacteria infections and 45 from patients with suspected tuberculosis which was eventually ruled out). All samples were tested by two CE-marked assays (Xpert®MTB/RIF and AnyplexTM plus MTB/NTM) and two in-house assays targeting senX3-regX3 and the IS6110 gene. Results The detection limit ranged from 1.00E+01 fg for Anyplex, senX3-regX3 and IS6110 to 1.00E+04 fg for Xpert. All three Xpert, senX3-regX3 and IS6110 assays detected all 37 smear-positive cases. Conversely, Anyplex was positive in 34 (91.9%) smear-positive cases. In patients with smear-negative tuberculosis, differences were observed between the assays; Xpert detected 22 (56.41%) of the 39 smear-negative samples, Anyplex 24 (61.53%), senX3-regX3 28 (71.79%) and IS6110 35 (89.74%). Xpert and senX3-regX3 were negative in all control samples; however, the false positive rate was 8.7% and 13% for Anyplex and IS6110, respectively. The overall sensitivity was 77.6%, 85.7%, 77.3% and 94.7% and the specificity was 100%, 100%, 90.8% and 87.0% for the Xpert, senX3-regX3, Anyplex and IS6110 assays, respectively. Conclusion Real-time PCR assays targeting IS6110 lack the desired specificity. The Xpert MTB/RIF and in-house senX3-regX3 assays are both sensitive and specific for the detection of MTBC in both pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples. Therefore, the real time PCR senX3-regX3 based assay could be a useful and complementary tool in the diagnosis of tuberculosis.

Bibliographic Details

http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84957572984&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26600434; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143025; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143025&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143025; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0143025; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.t002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143025&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143025; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143025.t003

Rocio Sanjuan-Jimenez; Inmaculada Toro-Peinado; Pilar Bermudez; Juan D. Colmenero; Pilar Morata; Hemant J Purohit

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Multidisciplinary

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know