Vaginal microbiome characterization of Nellore cattle using metagenomic analysis
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 10, Issue: 11, Page: e0143294
2015
- 106Citations
- 132Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations106
- Citation Indexes105
- 105
- CrossRef28
- Policy Citations1
- 1
- Captures132
- Readers132
- 132
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequencing data for the taxonomic characterization of the vaginal and the fecal microbial communities in Hanwoo.
INTRODUCTION Cattle are important for humankind, and their microbiome research has mainly examined the rumen, small intestine, and other parts of the digestive tract [1].
Article Description
Understanding of microbial communities inhabiting cattle vaginal tract may lead to a better comprehension of bovine physiology and reproductive health being of great economic interest. Up to date, studies involving cattle microbiota are focused on the gastrointestinal tract, and little is known about the vaginal microbiota. This study aimed to investigate the vaginal microbiome in Nellore cattle, heifers and cows, pregnant and non-pregnant, using a culture independent approach. The main bacterial phyla found were Firmicutes (∼40-50%), Bacteroidetes (∼15-25%) and Proteobacteria (∼5-25%), in addition to ∼10-20% of non-classified bacteria. 45-55% of the samples were represented by only ten OTUs: Aeribacillus, Bacteroides, Clostridium, Ruminococcus, Rikenella, Alistipes, Bacillus, Eubacterium, Prevotella and non-classified bacteria. Interestingly, microbiota from all 20 animals could be grouped according to the respiratory metabolism of the main OTUs found, creating three groups of vaginal microbiota in cattle. Archaeal samples were dominated by the Methanobrevibacter genus (Euryarchaeota, ∼55-70%). Ascomycota was the main fungal phylum (∼80-95%) and Mycosphaerella the most abundant genus (∼70-85%). Hormonal influence was not clear, but a tendency for the reduction of bacterial and increase of archaeal populations in pregnant animals was observed. Eukaryotes did not vary significantly between pregnant and non-pregnant animals, but tended to be more abundant on cows than on heifers. The present work describes a great microbial variability in the vaginal community among the evaluated animals and groups (heifers and cows, pregnant and non-pregnant), which is significantly different from the findings previously reported using culture dependent methods, pointing out the need for further studies on this issue. The microbiome found also indicates that the vaginal colonization appears to be influenced by the gastrointestinal community.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0143294; 10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g009; 10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g006; 10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g007; 10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g008
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84957607722&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26599789; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g009; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g009; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g007; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g008; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g008; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g008; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g008; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g007; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143294; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g009; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g009; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g005; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0143294; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143294&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143294&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143294; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g008; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g009; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g007; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143294; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.g006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know