Study of a high-yield cellulase system created by heavy-ion irradiation-induced mutagenesis of Aspergillus Niger and mixed fermentation with Trichoderma reesei
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 10, Issue: 12, Page: e0144233
2015
- 15Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations15
- Citation Indexes15
- 15
- CrossRef5
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 16
Article Description
The aim of this study was to evaluate and validate the efficiency of 12C6+ irradiation of Aspergillus Niger (A. Niger) or mutagenesis via mixed Trichoderma viride (T. viride) culturing as well as a liquid cultivation method for cellulase production via mixed Trichoderma reesei (T. reesei) and A. Niger culture fermentation. The first mutagenesis approach was employed to optimize yield from a cellulase-producing strain via heavy-ion mutagenesis and highthroughput screening, and the second was to effectively achieve enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulase from a mixed culture of mutant T. viride and A. Niger.We found that 12C6+-ion irradiation induced changes in cellulase biosynthesis in A. Niger but had no effect on the time course of the synthesis. It is notable that the exoglucanases (CBH) activities of A. Niger strains H11-1 and H differed (6.71 U/mL vs. 6.01 U/mL) and were significantly higher than that of A. Niger mutant H3-1. Compared with strain H, the filter paper assay (FPA), endoglucanase (EG) and ß-glucosidase (BGL) activities of mutant strain H11-1 were increased by 250.26%, 30.26% and 34.91%, respectively. A mixed culture system was successfully optimized, and the best ratio of T. reesei to A. Niger was 5:1 for 96 h with simultaneous inoculation. The BGL activity of the mixed culture increased after 72 h. At 96 h, the FPA and BGL activities of the mixed culture were 689.00 and 797.15 U/mL, respectively, significantly higher than those of monocultures, which were 408.70 and 646.98 U/mL for T. reesei and 447.29 and 658.89 U/mL for A. Niger, respectively. The EG activity of the mixed culture was 2342.81 U/mL, a value that was significantly higher than that of monocultures at 2206.57 U/ mL for T. reesei and 1727.62 U/mL for A. Niger. In summary, cellulose production and hydrolysis yields were significantly enhanced by the proposed combination scheme.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0144233; 10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g007; 10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g006; 10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g005
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84957112338&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26656155; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g007; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0144233; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g007; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0144233&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g007; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g005; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0144233&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0144233; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144233.g002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0144233; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0144233
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know