Does AMH reflect follicle number similarly in women with and without PCOS?
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 11, Issue: 1, Page: e0146739
2016
- 28Citations
- 56Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations28
- Citation Indexes27
- 27
- CrossRef8
- Clinical Citations1
- PubMed Guidelines1
- Captures56
- Readers56
- 56
Article Description
Context: Increased Anti-Mullerian Hormone in polycystic ovary syndrome, may be due to overactive follicles rather than reflect antral follicle count. Objective: Does Anti-Mullerian Hormone reflect antral follicle count similarly in women with or without polycystic ovary syndrome or polycystic ovarian morphology? Design: Cross-sectional, case-control. Setting: Women who delivered preterm in 1999-2006. For each index woman, a woman with a term delivery was identified. Patients: Participation rate was 69%. Between 2006-2008, 262 women were included, and diagnosed to have polycystic ovary syndrome, polycystic ovarian morphology or to be normal controls. Intervention(s): Blood tests, a clinical examination and vaginal ultrasound. Main Outcome Measure(s): Anti-Mullerian Hormone / antral follicle count -ratio, SHBG, androstenedione and insulin, to test potential influence on the Anti-Mullerian Hormone/antral follicle count -ratio. Results: Mean Anti-Mullerian Hormone / antral follicle count ratio in women with polycystic ovary syndrome or polycystic ovarian morphology was similar to that of the controls (polycystic ovary syndrome: 1,2 p = 0,10 polycystic ovarian morphology: 1,2, p = 0,27 Controls 1,3). Anti-Mullerian Hormone showed a positive linear correlation to antral follicle count in all groups. Multivariate analysis did not change the results. Conclusions: We confirmed the positive correlation between AMH and follicle count. Anti-Mullerian Hormone seems to be a reliable predictor of antral follicle count, independent of polycystic ovary syndrome diagnosis or ovarian morphology.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84958212358&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146739; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26799212; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146739.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146739.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146739; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146739.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146739.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146739; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0146739; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146739.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0146739.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146739.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0146739.g002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0146739; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0146739&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0146739; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146739.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146739; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0146739&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0146739; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146739.g001
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know