No habitat selection during spring migration at a meso-scale range across mosaic landscapes: A case study with the woodcock (Scolopax rusticola)
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 11, Issue: 3, Page: e0149790
2016
- 5Citations
- 42Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef4
- Captures42
- Readers42
- 42
Article Description
Success of migration in birds in part depends on habitat selection. Overall, it is still poorly known whether there is habitat selection amongst landbird migrants moving across landscapes. Europe is chiefly covered by agro-forestry mosaic landscapes, so migratory species associated to either agricultural landscapes or woodland habitats should theoretically find suitable stopover sites along migration. During migration from wintering to breeding quarters, woodcocks (Scolopax rusticola) tagged with PTT satellite-tracking transmitters were used to test for the hypothesis that migrants associated to agro-forest habitats have no habitat selection during migration, at a meso-scale level. Using a GIS platform we extracted at a meso-scale range habitat cover at stopover localities. Results obtained from comparisons of soil covers between points randomly selected and true stopover localities sites revealed, as expected, the species may not select for particular habitats at a mesoscale range, because the habitat (or habitats) required by the species can be found virtually everywhere on their migration route. However, those birds stopping over in places richer in cropland or mosaic habitats including both cropland and forest and with proportionally less closed forest stayed for longer than in areas with lower surfaces of cropland and mosaic and more closed forest. This suggests that areas rich in cropland or mosaic habitat were optimal.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0149790; 10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84962339279&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27002975; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0149790; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.g002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0149790; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0149790&type=printable; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0149790&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0149790; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.t004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149790.g001
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know