Identification of multi-functional Enzyme with multi-label classifier
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 11, Issue: 4, Page: e0153503
2016
- 23Citations
- 36Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations23
- Citation Indexes23
- 23
- CrossRef5
- Captures36
- Readers36
- 36
Article Description
Enzymes are important and effective biological catalyst proteins participating in almost all active cell processes. Identification of multi-functional enzymes is essential in understanding the function of enzymes. Machine learning methods perform better in protein structure and function prediction than traditional biological wet experiments. Thus, in this study, we explore an efficient and effective machine learning method to categorize enzymes according to their function. Multi-functional enzymes are predicted with a special machine learning strategy, namely, multi-label classifier. Sequence features are extracted from a positionspecific scoring matrix with autocross-covariance transformation. Experiment results show that the proposed method obtains an accuracy rate of 94.1% in classifying six main functional classes through five cross-validation tests and outperforms state-of-the-art methods. In addition, 91.25% accuracy is achieved in multi-functional enzyme prediction, which is often ignored in other enzyme function prediction studies. The online prediction server and datasets can be accessed from the link http://server.malab.cn/MEC/. Copyright:
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0153503; 10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t004
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84964378060&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27078147; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153503; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153503; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153503&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.g002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0153503; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t004; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153503&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153503.t003
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know