Regular sputum check-up for early diagnosis of tuberculosis after exposure in healthcare facilities
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 11, Issue: 6, Page: e0157054
2016
- 6Citations
- 38Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- Captures38
- Readers38
- 38
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Regular Sputum Check-Up for Early Diagnosis of Tuberculosis after Exposure in Healthcare Facilities
by Wen-Cheng Chao, Chieh-Liang Wu, Po-Yu Liu, Chi-Chang Shieh Background The early diagnosis of patients with TB disease is critical after an outbreak of tuberculosis
Article Description
Background: The early diagnosis of patients with TB disease is critical after an outbreak of tuberculosis (TB) infection in healthcare facilities. In this study, we report a catastrophic TB outbreak in a psychiatric healthcare facility and analyze the role of regular sputum check-ups and other diagnostic tools to facilitate an early diagnosis. Methods: Every exposed participant received regular sputum check-ups and chest X-rays (CXR) as part of the outbreak management protocol. We retrospectively analyzed data from the contact participants to identify risk factors for eventual TB development and investigated the diagnostic efficacy of regular sputum check-ups. Results: Among 133 contact participants, 16 (12.0%) developed TB during the 4-year follow-up period. Low body-mass-index (BMI) (<21) (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 3.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-8.98) and long duration of contact (>3 months) (aHR 8.70, 95% CI, 1.14-63.34) independently predicted the development of TB. Even though regular sputum check-ups required significant resources, they did facilitate the early identification of new TB cases among the contact participants. Regular sputum check-ups for high-risk patients based on BMI, contact duration and CXR findings may be a practical approach when compared with universal sputum follow-up, with a slightly decreased sensitivity but high positive likelihood ratio (88%, [95% CI, 62-98%] and 5.12, [95%CI, 3.30-7.95], respectively). Conclusion: While regular sputum check-ups for all contact participants facilitated the early identification of cases after the outbreak of TB in the healthcare facility, regular sputum check-ups for high-risk patients might be an effective alternative in resource-limited settings.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0157054; 10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84973360075&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27258370; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0157054; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0157054&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.t002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0157054; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.g002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0157054&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0157054; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157054.t003
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know