Rapid discrimination of malignant breast lesions from normal tissues utilizing raman spectroscopy system: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 11, Issue: 7, Page: e0159860
2016
- 8Citations
- 24Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef5
- Captures24
- Readers24
- 24
Review Description
Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Raman spectroscopy system in the detection of malignant breast lesions through a systemic review and meta-analysis of published studies. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed and Embase from 2000 to June 2015. Published studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of Raman spectroscopy in distinguishing malignant breast lesions from benign lesions and normal tissues were included in our study. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and the area under the curve of summary receiver-operating characteristic curves was derived. A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies guidelines was used to assess the quality of included studies. Results: The initial search produced a total of 157 articles after removing duplicates. Nine studies (8 in vitro and 1 in vivo) were eligible in this meta-analysis. We analyzed the eight in vitro studies with 1756 lesions, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of Raman spectroscopy system for the diagnosis of malignant breast lesions were 0.92 (95% CI 0.86-0.96) and 0.97 (97% CI 0.93-0.98), respectively. Diagnostic odds ratio was 266.70 (95% CI 89.38-795.79), and the area under the curve of summary receiver-operating characteristic curves was 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99). Significant heterogeneity was found between studies. There was no evidence of considerable publication bias. Conclusions: Raman spectroscopy system is an optical diagnostic technology with great value for detecting malignant breast lesions. At the same time, it has advantages of being non-invasive, real-time, and easy to use. Thus it deserves to be further explored for intra-operatory breast tumor margin detection.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0159860; 10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84979993327&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27459193; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159860; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g005; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159860; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159860&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.t001; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159860&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0159860; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159860.g005
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know