Tendon reattachment to bone in an ovine tendon defect model of retraction using allogenic and xenogenic demineralised bone matrix incorporated with mesenchymal stem cells
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 11, Issue: 9, Page: e0161473
2016
- 26Citations
- 33Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations26
- Citation Indexes26
- 26
- CrossRef10
- Captures33
- Readers33
- 33
Article Description
Background: Tendon-bone healing following rotator cuff repairs is mainly impaired by poor tissue quality. Demineralised bone matrix promotes healing of the tendon-bone interface but its role in the treatment of tendon tears with retraction has not been investigated. We hypothesized that cortical demineralised bone matrix used with minimally manipulated mesenchymal stem cells will result in improved function and restoration of the tendon-bone interface with no difference between xenogenic and allogenic scaffolds. Materials and Methods: In an ovine model, the patellar tendon was detached from the tibial tuberosity and a complete distal tendon transverse defect measuring 1 cm was created. Suture anchors were used to reattach the tendon and xenogenic demineralised bone matrix + minimally manipulated mesenchymal stem cells (n = 5), or allogenic demineralised bone matrix + minimally manipulated mesenchymal stem cells (n = 5) were used to bridge the defect. Graft incorporation into the tendon and its effect on regeneration of the enthesis was assessed using histomorphometry. Force plate analysis was used to assess functional recovery. Results: Compared to the xenograft, the allograft was associated with significantly higher functional weight bearing at 6 (P = 0.047), 9 (P = 0.028), and 12 weeks (P = 0.009). In the allogenic group this was accompanied by greater remodeling of the demineralised bone matrix into tendon-like tissue in the region of the defect (p = 0.015), and a more direct type of enthesis characterized by significantly more fibrocartilage (p = 0.039). No failures of tendon-bone healing were noted in either group. Conclusion: Demineralised bone matrix used with minimally manipulated mesenchymal stem cells promotes healing of the tendon-bone interface in an ovine model of acute tendon retraction, with superior mechanical and histological results associated with use of an allograft.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0161473; 10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84992168473&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27606597; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161473; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161473&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.t001; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161473&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161473; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161473.g001
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know