Differing alterations of two esca associated fungi, phaeoacremonium aleophilum and phaeomoniella chlamydospora on transcriptomic level, to co-cultured Vitis Vinifera L Calli
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 11, Issue: 9, Page: e0163344
2016
- 10Citations
- 51Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef6
- Captures51
- Readers51
- 51
Article Description
The filamentous fungi Phaeoacremonium aleophilum (P.al, Teleomorph: Togninia minima) and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora (P.ch) are believed to be causal agents of wood symptoms associated with the Esca associated young vine decline. The occurrence of these diseases is dramatically increasing in vineyards all over the world whereas efficient therapeutic strategies are lacking. Both fungi occupy the same ecological niche within the grapevine trunk. We found them predominantly within the xylem vessels and surrounding cell walls which raises the question whether the transcriptional response towards plant cell secreted metabolites is comparable. In order to address this question we co-inoculated grapevine callus culture cells with the respective fungi and analyzed their transcriptomes by RNA sequencing. This experimental setup appears suitable since we aimed to investigate the effects caused by the plant thereby excluding all effects caused by other microorganisms omnipresent in planta and nutrient depletion. Bioinformatics analysis of the sequencing data revealed that 837 homologous genes were found to have comparable expression pattern whereas none of which was found to be differentially expressed in both strains upon exposure to the plant cells. Despite the fact that both fungi induced the transcription of oxido-reductases, likely to cope with reactive oxygen species produced by plant cells, the transcriptomics response of both fungi compared to each other is rather different in other domains. Within the transcriptome of P.ch beside increased transcript levels for oxido-reductases, plant cell wall degrading enzymes and detoxifying enzymes were found. On the other hand in P.al the transcription of some oxido-reductases was increased whereas others appeared to be repressed. In this fungus the confrontation to plant cells results in higher transcript levels of heat shock and chaperon-like proteins as well as genes encoding proteins involved in primary metabolism.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0163344; 10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.t001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84992183858&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27658052; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163344; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163344&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163344; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163344&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163344.g004
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know