Reduced risk of importing Ebola virus disease because of travel restrictions in 2014: A retrospective epidemiological modeling study
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 11, Issue: 9, Page: e0163418
2016
- 26Citations
- 63Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations26
- Citation Indexes19
- 19
- CrossRef4
- Policy Citations7
- 7
- Captures63
- Readers63
- 63
Article Description
Background: An epidemic of Ebola virus disease (EVD) from 2013-16 posed a serious risk of global spread during its early growth phase. A post-epidemic evaluation of the effectiveness of travel restrictions has yet to be conducted. The present study aimed to estimate the effectiveness of travel restrictions in reducing the risk of importation from mid-August to September, 2014, using a simple hazard-based statistical model. Methodology/Principal Findings: The hazard rate was modeled as an inverse function of the effective distance, an excellent predictor of disease spread, which was calculated from the airline transportation network. By analyzing datasets of the date of EVD case importation from the 15th of July to the 15th of September 2014, and assuming that the network structure changed from the 8th of August 2014 because of travel restrictions, parameters that characterized the hazard rate were estimated. The absolute risk reduction and relative risk reductions due to travel restrictions were estimated to be less than 1% and about 20%, respectively, for all models tested. Effectiveness estimates among African countries were greater than those for other countries outside Africa. Conclusions: The travel restrictions were not effective enough to expect the prevention of global spread of Ebola virus disease. It is more efficient to control the spread of disease locally during an early phase of an epidemic than to attempt to control the epidemic at international borders. Capacity building for local containment and coordinated and expedited international cooperation are essential to reduce the risk of global transmission.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0163418; 10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84992035734&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27657544; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163418; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g003; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163418&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163418; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163418&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163418.g002
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know