PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Randomized controlled trials to define viral load thresholds for cytomegalovirus pre-emptive therapy

PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 11, Issue: 9, Page: e0163722
2016
  • 37
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 46
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Article Description

Background: To help decide when to start and when to stop pre-emptive therapy for cytomegalovirus infection, we conducted two open-label randomized controlled trials in renal, liver and bone marrow transplant recipients in a single centre where pre-emptive therapy is indicated if viraemia exceeds 3000 genomes/ml (2520 IU/ml) of whole blood. Methods: Patients with two consecutive viraemia episodes each below 3000 genomes/ml were randomized to continue monitoring or to immediate treatment (Part A). A separate group of patients with viral load greater than 3000 genomes/ml was randomized to stop pre-emptive therapy when two consecutive levels less than 200 genomes/ml (168 IU/ml) or less than 3000 genomes/ml were obtained (Part B). For both parts, the primary endpoint was the occurrence of a separate episode of viraemia requiring treatment because it was greater than 3000 genomes/ml. Results: In Part A, the primary endpoint was not significantly different between the two arms; 18/32 (56%) in the monitor arm had viraemia greater than 3000 genomes/ml compared to 10/27 (37%) in the immediate treatment arm (p = 0.193). However, the time to developing an episode of viraemia greater than 3000 genomes/ml was significantly delayed among those randomized to immediate treatment (p = 0.022). In Part B, the primary endpoint was not significantly different between the two arms; 19/55 (35%) in the less than 200 genomes/ml arm subsequently had viraemia greater than 3000 genomes/ml compared to 23/51 (45%) among those randomized to stop treatment in the less than 3000 genomes/ml arm (p = 0.322). However, the duration of antiviral treatment was significantly shorter (p = 0.0012) in those randomized to stop treatment when viraemia was less than 3000 genomes/ml. Discussion: The results illustrate that patients have continuing risks for CMV infection with limited time available for intervention. We see no need to alter current rules for stopping or starting pre-emptive therapy.

Bibliographic Details

http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84991669542&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27684379; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163722; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163722&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g001; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163722&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163722; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g003

Paul D. Griffiths; Emily Rothwell; Mohammed Raza; Stephanie Wilmore; Tomas Doyle; Mark Harber; James O’Beirne; Stephen Mackinnon; Gareth Jones; Douglas Thorburn; Frank Mattes; Gaia Nebbia; Sowsan Atabani; Colette Smith; Anna Stanton; Vincent C. Emery; Carlo Federico Perno

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Multidisciplinary

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know