Randomized controlled trials to define viral load thresholds for cytomegalovirus pre-emptive therapy
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 11, Issue: 9, Page: e0163722
2016
- 37Citations
- 46Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations37
- Citation Indexes36
- 36
- CrossRef8
- Clinical Citations1
- PubMed Guidelines1
- Captures46
- Readers46
- 46
Article Description
Background: To help decide when to start and when to stop pre-emptive therapy for cytomegalovirus infection, we conducted two open-label randomized controlled trials in renal, liver and bone marrow transplant recipients in a single centre where pre-emptive therapy is indicated if viraemia exceeds 3000 genomes/ml (2520 IU/ml) of whole blood. Methods: Patients with two consecutive viraemia episodes each below 3000 genomes/ml were randomized to continue monitoring or to immediate treatment (Part A). A separate group of patients with viral load greater than 3000 genomes/ml was randomized to stop pre-emptive therapy when two consecutive levels less than 200 genomes/ml (168 IU/ml) or less than 3000 genomes/ml were obtained (Part B). For both parts, the primary endpoint was the occurrence of a separate episode of viraemia requiring treatment because it was greater than 3000 genomes/ml. Results: In Part A, the primary endpoint was not significantly different between the two arms; 18/32 (56%) in the monitor arm had viraemia greater than 3000 genomes/ml compared to 10/27 (37%) in the immediate treatment arm (p = 0.193). However, the time to developing an episode of viraemia greater than 3000 genomes/ml was significantly delayed among those randomized to immediate treatment (p = 0.022). In Part B, the primary endpoint was not significantly different between the two arms; 19/55 (35%) in the less than 200 genomes/ml arm subsequently had viraemia greater than 3000 genomes/ml compared to 23/51 (45%) among those randomized to stop treatment in the less than 3000 genomes/ml arm (p = 0.322). However, the duration of antiviral treatment was significantly shorter (p = 0.0012) in those randomized to stop treatment when viraemia was less than 3000 genomes/ml. Discussion: The results illustrate that patients have continuing risks for CMV infection with limited time available for intervention. We see no need to alter current rules for stopping or starting pre-emptive therapy.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0163722; 10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84991669542&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27684379; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163722; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163722&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g001; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163722&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163722; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163722.g003
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know