Effects of thinning and water supply manipulation on the productivity of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica in Northeastern China
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 11, Issue: 11, Page: e0166109
2016
- 5Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- Captures14
- Readers14
- 14
Article Description
Management is an effective tool for increasing the productivity of Mongolian pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica). This species has been widely planted in China, especially in sandy lands. However, optimization of management practices had not been fully explored. We established a system dynamic model to evaluate the effects of thinning and of manipulation of water supply on the productivity and population density of a Mongolian pine forest (17 scenarios in total). Different levels of thinning increased the mean biomass of Mongolian pine over no-management to a range from 202 to 256 t·ha. Increasing water supply decreased the mean biomass of Mongolian pine to a range from 176 to 199 t·ha. These results indicated that thinning at different levels may lead to an increase in biomass accumulation, while manipulating water supply may decrease biomass. Further, thinning appeared more effective than increasing water supply in efforts at maintaining high productivity of Mongolian pine forests. Moreover, the highest biomass occurred in a scenario with a thinning intensity of 30% in over-mature trees, indicating that this thinning intensity was the most effective choice for to the maintenance of the highest biomass in Mongolian pine forests. This study informs about the interactions between Mongolian pine and forest management, and provides guidelines for the practice of management of this forest type.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0166109; 10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g005
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84994403521&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27829012; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0166109; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0166109&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0166109; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109.g004; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0166109; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0166109&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know