Significant local-scale plant-insect species richness relationship independent of abiotic effects in the temperate cape floristic region biodiversity hotspot
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 12, Issue: 1, Page: e0168033
2017
- 37Citations
- 155Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations37
- Citation Indexes37
- 37
- CrossRef10
- Captures155
- Readers155
- 155
Article Description
Globally plant species richness is a significant predictor of insect richness. Whether this is the result of insect diversity responding directly to plant diversity, or both groups responding in similar ways to extrinsic factors, has been much debated. Here we assess this relationship in the Cape Floristic Region (CFR), a biodiversity hotspot. The CFR has higher plant diversity than expected from latitude (i.e., abiotic conditions), but very little is known about the diversity of insects residing in this region. We first quantify diversity relationships at multiple spatial scales for one of the dominant plant families in the CFR, the Restionaceae, and its associated insect herbivore community. Plant and insect diversity are significantly positively correlated at the local scales (10-50 m; 0.1-3 km), but not at the regional scales (15-20 km; 50-70 km). The local scale relationship remains significantly positively correlated even when accounting for the influence of extrinsic variables and other vegetation attributes. This suggests that the diversity of local insect assemblages may be more strongly influenced by plant species richness than by abiotic variables. Further, vegetation age and plant structural complexity also influenced insect richness. The ratio of insect species per plant species in the CFR is comparable to other temperate regions around the world, suggesting that the insect diversity of the CFR is high relative to other areas of the globe with similar abiotic conditions, primarily as a result of the unusually high plant diversity in the region.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0168033; 10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85009274752&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28076412; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0168033; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.g003; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0168033; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0168033&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0168033; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t001; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0168033&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.t004
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know