Distinctions in breast tumor recurrence patterns post-therapy among racially distinct populations
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 12, Issue: 1, Page: e0170095
2017
- 9Citations
- 28Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef9
- Captures28
- Readers28
- 28
- Mentions2
- News Mentions2
- 2
Most Recent News
Breast cancer prognosis of African-American patients may improve with chemotherapy before surgery
Administering chemotherapy to African-American breast cancer patients prior to surgery could improve their prognosis and survival rates from the disease, according to a new study.
Article Description
Background: Clinical studies have revealed a higher risk of breast tumor recurrence in African-American (AA) patients compared to European-American (EA) patients, contributing to the alarming inequality in clinical outcomes among the ethnic groups. However, distinctions in recurrence patterns upon receiving hormone, radiation, and/or chemotherapy between the races remain poorly characterized. Methods: We compared patterns and rates (per 1000 cancer patients per 1 year) of recurrence following each form of treatment between AA (n = 1850) and EA breast cancer patients (n = 7931) from a cohort of patients (n = 10504) treated between 2005-2015 at Northside Hospital in Atlanta, GA. Results: Among patients who received any combination of adjuvant therapy, AA displayed higher overall rates of recurrence than EA (p = 0.015; HR: 1.699; CI: 1.108-2.606). Furthermore, recurrence rates were higher in AA than EA among stage I (p = 0.031; HR: 1.736; CI: 1.052-2.864) and T1 classified patients (p = 0.003; HR: 2.009; CI: 1.263-3.197). Interestingly, among patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, AA displayed higher rates of local recurrence than EA (p = 0.024; HR: 7.134; CI: 1.295-39.313). Conclusion: Our analysis revealed higher incidence rates of recurrence in AA compared to EA among patients that received any combination of adjuvant therapy. Moreover, our data demonstrates an increased risk of tumor recurrence in AA than EA among patients diagnosed with minimally invasive disease. This is the first clinical study to suggest that neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves breast cancer recurrence rates and patterns in AA.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0170095; 10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.t001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85009265591&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28085947; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0170095; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.g002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0170095; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0170095&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0170095&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.g003; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0170095; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170095.t003
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know