Fruit consumption and physical activity in relation to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among 70,000 Chinese adults with pre-existing vascular disease
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 12, Issue: 4, Page: e0173054
2017
- 16Citations
- 51Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations16
- Citation Indexes13
- CrossRef5
- Policy Citations3
- Policy Citation3
- Captures51
- Readers51
- 51
Article Description
Objectives To assess the associations of fresh fruit consumption and total physical activity with allcause and cardiovascular mortality among Chinese adults who have been diagnosed with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or hypertension. Methods During 2004-08, the China Kadoorie Biobank study recruited 70,047 adults, aged 30-79 years, with physician-diagnosed stroke or transient ischaemic attack, ischemic heart disease, or hypertension. Information on diet and physical activity was collected using an interviewer- administered electronic questionnaire. Cox regression was used to yield hazard ratios (HRs) for the independent and joint associations of fresh fruit consumption and total physical activity with mortality. Results At baseline, 32.9% of participants consumed fresh fruit regularly (i.e. >3 days/week) and the mean total physical activity were 15.8 (SD = 11.8) MET-hr/day. During ∼7-years follow-up, 6569 deaths occurred with 3563 from CVD. Compared to participants with <1 day/week fruit consumption, regular consumers had HR (95% CI) of 0.84 (0.79-0.89) for all-cause mortality and 0.79 (0.73-0.86) for CVD mortality. The HRs for the top vs bottom tertile of physical activity were 0.68 (0.64-0.72) and 0.65 (0.60-0.71), respectively, with no clear evidence of reverse causality. After correcting for regression dilution, each 100 g/day usual consumption of fresh fruit or 10 MET-hr/day usual levels of physical activity was associated with 23-29% lower mortality. The combination of regular fruit consumption with top 3 of physical activity (>16.53 MET-hr/day) was associated with about 40% lower mortality. Conclusion Among Chinese adults with pre-existing vascular disease, higher physical activity and fruit consumption were both independently and jointly associated with lower mortality.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0173054; 10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85017526267&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28403155; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173054; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173054; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173054&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g003; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173054&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g004; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.t001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0173054; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.t001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173054.g001
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know