High throughput SNP discovery and genotyping in hexaploid wheat
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 13, Issue: 1, Page: e0186329
2018
- 152Citations
- 143Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations152
- Citation Indexes149
- 149
- CrossRef7
- Policy Citations3
- Policy Citation3
- Captures143
- Readers143
- 143
Article Description
Because of their abundance and their amenability to high-throughput genotyping techniques, Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) are powerful tools for efficient genetics and genomics studies, including characterization of genetic resources, genome-wide association studies and genomic selection. In wheat, most of the previous SNP discovery initiatives targeted the coding fraction, leaving almost 98% of the wheat genome largely unexploited. Here we report on the use of whole-genome resequencing data from eight wheat lines to mine for SNPs in the genic, the repetitive and non-repetitive intergenic fractions of the wheat genome. Eventually, we identified 3.3 million SNPs, 49% being located on the B-genome, 41% on the A-genome and 10% on the D-genome. We also describe the development of the TaBW280K high-throughput genotyping array containing 280,226 SNPs. Performance of this chip was examined by genotyping a set of 96 wheat accessions representing the worldwide diversity. Sixty-nine percent of the SNPs can be efficiently scored, half of them showing a diploid-like clustering. The TaBW280K was proven to be a very efficient tool for diversity analyses, as well as for breeding as it can discriminate between closely related elite varieties. Finally, the TaBW280K array was used to genotype a population derived from a cross between Chinese Spring and Renan, leading to the construction a dense genetic map comprising 83,721 markers. The results described here will provide the wheat community with powerful tools for both basic and applied research.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0186329; 10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.g003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85039987637&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186329; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29293495; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186329; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186329; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0186329; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0186329.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0186329&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know