Genetic dissection of the relationships between grain yield components by genome-wide association mapping in a collection of tetraploid wheats
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 13, Issue: 1, Page: e0190162
2018
- 57Citations
- 69Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations57
- Citation Indexes57
- 57
- CrossRef47
- Captures69
- Readers69
- 69
Article Description
Increasing grain yield potential in wheat has been a major target of most breeding programs. Genetic advance has been frequently hindered by negative correlations among yield components that have been often observed in segregant populations and germplasm collections. A tetraploid wheat collection was evaluated in seven environments and genotyped with a 90K SNP assay to identify major and stable quantitative trait loci (QTL) for grain yield per spike (GYS), kernel number per spike (KNS) and thousand-kernel weight (TKW), and to analyse the genetic relationships between the yield components at QTL level. The genome-wide association analysis detected eight, eleven and ten QTL for KNS, TKW and GYS, respectively, significant in at least three environments or two environments and the mean across environments. Most of the QTL for TKW and KNS were found located in different marker intervals, indicating that they are genetically controlled independently by each other. Out of eight KNS QTL, three were associated to significant increases of GYS, while the increased grain number of five additional QTL was completely or partially compensated by decreases in grain weight, thus producing no or reduced effects on GYS. Similarly, four consistent and five suggestive TKW QTL resulted in visible increase of GYS, while seven additional QTL were associated to reduced effects in grain number and no effects on GYS. Our results showed that QTL analysis for detecting TKW or KNS alleles useful for improving grain yield potential should consider the pleiotropic effects of the QTL or the association to other QTLs.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0190162; 10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.g003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85040324475&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190162; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29324803; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190162; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190162; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190162; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190162.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190162&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know