Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of ocular parameters obtained by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer compared to the IOLMaster in healthy eyes
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 13, Issue: 2, Page: e0193023
2018
- 43Citations
- 26Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations43
- Citation Indexes43
- 43
- CrossRef1
- Captures26
- Readers26
- 26
Article Description
Purpose: To assess the precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of ocular parameters measured by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer, and to compare them with those measured by the IOLMaster. Methods: In this prospective study, the right eyes of 108 healthy subjects were included. Three consecutive scans were obtained by 2 observers using the Tomey OA-2000, and in the same session one observer used the IOLMaster (version 5.4.4.0006) for the measurements. About 1 week later, 3 scans were obtained by one observer using the Tomey OA-2000. The axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), keratometer readings, pupil diameter (PD) and corneal diameter (CD) values measured by the Tomey OA-2000 and IOLMaster were analyzed. The coefficient of variation (CoV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), within subject standard deviation (Sw) and 2.77Sw were calculated to assess the repeatability and reproducibility. The paired t test and Bland-Altman plots were used to analyze the differences and agreements of parameters measured by the two devices, respectively. Results: Intraobserver repeatability, and interobserver and intersession reproducibility of the AL, CCT, ACD, LT, Kf, Ks, Km, PD and CD values measured by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer showed a CoV of less than 1% except that for PD, and an ICC of more than 0.97 except that for PD and CD. The AL, Kf, Ks, Km and CD values measured by the Tomey OA-2000 were 0.058 ± 0.094 mm, 0.088± 0.150 diopters (D), 0.163 ± 0.170 D, 0.127 ± 0.117 D and 0.171 ± 0.217 mm lower than those measured by the IOLMaster, respectively (all Ps < 0.05). However, the ACD values from the two devices were comparable (P = 0.169). The 95% linite of agreement (LoA) of the AL, ACD, CD and all keratometer readings were no more than 0.24 mm, 0.14 mm 0.60 mm and 0.5 D, respectively. Conclusion: Except for the PD and CD, the ocular parameters measured by the Tomey OA-2000 were highly repeatable and reproducible. Except for the CD value, there was good agreement of ocular parameters measured by the Tomey OA-2000 and the IOLMaster in healthy eyes.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0193023; 10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.t004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.t003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85042685976&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193023; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29486009; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.t004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.t004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193023; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.t004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193023; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0193023; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0193023&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0193023
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know