Increased circulating microrna-122 is a biomarker for discrimination and risk stratification in patients defined by sepsis-3 criteria
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 13, Issue: 5, Page: e0197637
2018
- 39Citations
- 56Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations39
- Citation Indexes37
- 37
- CrossRef4
- Policy Citations2
- Policy Citation2
- Captures56
- Readers56
- 56
Article Description
Background Sepsis is now operationally defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by an infection, identified by an acute change in SOFA-Score of at least two points, including clinical chemistry such as creatinine or bilirubin concentrations. However, little knowledge exists about organ-specific microRNAs as potentially new biomarkers. Accordingly, we tested the hypotheses that micro-RNA-122, the foremost liver-related micro-RNA (miR), 1) discriminates between sepsis and infection, 2) is an early predictor for mortality, and 3) improves the prognostic value of the SOFA-score. Methods We analyzed 108 patients with sepsis (infection + increase SOFA-Score 2) within the first 24h of ICU admission and as controls 20 patients with infections without sepsis (infection + SOFA-Score 1). Total circulating miR was isolated from serum and relative miR-122 expression was measured (using spiked-in cel-miR-54) and associated with 30-day survival. Results 30-day survival of the sepsis patients was 63%. miR-122 expression was 40-fold higher in non-survivors (p = 0.001) and increased almost 6-fold in survivors (p = 0.013) compared to controls. miR-122 serum-expression discriminated both between sepsis vs. infection (AUC 0.760, sensitivity 58.3%, specificity 95%) and survivors vs. non-survivors (AUC 0.728, sensitivity 42.5%, specificity 94%). Multivariate Cox-regression analysis revealed miR-122 (HR 4.3; 95%-CI 2.0–8.9, p<0.001) as independent prognostic factor for 30-day mortality. Furthermore, the predictive value for 30-day mortality of the SOFA-Score (AUC 0.668) was improved by adding miR-122 (AUC 0.743; net reclassification improvement 0.37, p<0.001; integrated discrimination improvement 0.07, p = 0.007). Conclusions Increased miR-122 serum concentration supports the discrimination between infection and sepsis, is an early and independent risk factor for 30-day mortality, and improves the prognostic value of the SOFA-Score, suggesting a potential role for miR-122 in sepsis-related prediction models.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0197637; 10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.t002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85047403858&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29782519; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197637; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.t003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197637&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g003; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0197637; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.t003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197637.g002
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know