Congruent phylogenetic relationships of melaphidina aphids (aphididae: Eriosomatinae: Fordini) according to nuclear and mitochondrial DNA data with taxonomic implications on generic limits
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 14, Issue: 2, Page: e0213181
2019
- 16Citations
- 130Usage
- 11Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations16
- Citation Indexes16
- 16
- CrossRef1
- Usage130
- Downloads111
- Abstract Views19
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
Article Description
Melaphidina aphids (Rhus-gall aphids; Eriosomatinae: Fordini) comprise five genera from eastern Asia and one monotypic genus from eastern North America. Melaphidina are unique in feeding on plant species of Rhus subgenus Rhus (Anacardiaceae), on which they form galls during the summer. The phylogenetic relationships among some species of Melaphidina aphids remain controversial. In this study, we sought to resolve the backbone phylogeny of Melaphidina aphids by sampling 15 accessions representing all six genera, all species, and all subspecies except Meitanaphis microgallis using 20 gene regions: Five nuclear genes as well as 13 protein-coding genes and two rRNA genes of the mitochondrial genome. Phylogenetic analyses included Bayesian and maximum likelihood methods. Independent analyses of nuclear and mitochondrial genes returned congruent topologies, and analyses of all gene regions combined showed well-supported relationships among Melaphidina species. In particular, these were: (1) Nurudea (excluding N. ibofushi) is sister to a clade composed of the five remaining genera; (2) the monotypic North American genus Melaphis is sister to a clade comprising the four remaining genera; and (3) (Schlechtendalia + N. ibofushi) is sister to the clade (Floraphis (Meitanaphis + Kaburagia). Our results support the transfer of Meitanaphis flavogallis to Kaburagia as an additional subspecies or species, and the recognition of Floraphis as a distinct genus. This study provides important molecular resources for subsequent evolutionary studies using more nuclear genes on the Melaphidina aphids and their close allies.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85062584116&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213181; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30818396; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213181; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/biology_facpub/1680; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2680&context=biology_facpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213181; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213181
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know