Correction: Dietary quality of predominantly traditional diets is associated with blood glucose profiles, but not with total fecal Bifidobacterium in Indonesian women(PLoS ONE (2018) 13:12 (e0208815) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208815)
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 14, Issue: 4, Page: e0215533
2019
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Correction Description
The PLOS ONE Staff Notice of republication An incorrect version of S1 File was published in error. The publisher apologizes for this error. This article was republished on April 1, 2019 to correct for this error. Please download this article again to view the correct version.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85064490130&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215533; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30998720; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215533; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215533; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0215533
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know