Molecular karyotyping of Siberian wild rye (Elymus sibiricus L.) with oligonucleotide fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 15, Issue: 1, Page: e0227208
2020
- 15Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations15
- Citation Indexes15
- 15
- Captures7
- Readers7
Article Description
Siberian wild rye (Elymus sibiricus L.), an allotetraploid species, is a potentially high-quality perennial forage crop native to temperate regions. We used fluorescently conjugated oligonucleotides, representing ten repetitive sequences, including 6 microsatellite repeats, two satellite repeats, and two ribosomal DNAs, to characterize E. sibiricus chromosomes, using sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization and genomic in situ hybridization assays. Our results showed that microsatellite repeats (AAG)10 or (AGG)10, satellite repeats pAs1 and pSc119.2, and ribosomal 5S rDNA and 45S rDNA are specific markers for unique chromosomes. A referable karyotype ideogram was suggested, by further polymorphism screening, across different E. sibiricus cultivars with a probe mixture of (AAG)10, Oligo-pAs1, and OligopSc119.2. Chromosomal polymorphisms vary between different genomes and between different individual chromosomes. In particular, two distinct forms of chromosome E in H genome were identified in intra- and inter-populations. Here, the significance of these results, for E. sibiricus genome research and breeding, and novel approaches to improve fluorescence in situ hybridization-based karyotyping are discussed.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0227208; 10.1371/journal.pone.0227208.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0227208.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0227208.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0227208.g003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85078068797&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227208; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31951623; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227208.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227208.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227208.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227208.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227208.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227208.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227208.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227208.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227208; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227208; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227208; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227208.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227208.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227208.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227208.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227208.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227208.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227208.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227208.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227208&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know