Bioluminescent imaging of Arabidopsis thaliana using an enhanced Nano-lantern luminescence reporter system
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 15, Issue: 1, Page: e0227477
2020
- 17Citations
- 61Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes17
- 17
- CrossRef2
- Captures61
- Readers61
- 61
Article Description
Bioluminescent detection has become a powerful method that is used extensively in numerous areas in life science research. Given that fluorescence detection in plant cells is difficult owing to the autofluorescence of chlorophyll, the use of a luciferin–luciferase system should be effective in plant biology. However, the suitable optical window for a luminescence system in plants remains unexplored. In this study, we sought to determine the optical window and optimal luciferase reporter system for terrestrial plant analyses using Arabidopsis thaliana as a model organism. We compared six different luciferase systems and found the green enhanced Nano-lantern (GeNL)–furimazine combination to be the optimal luciferase reporter. Spectral measurements of GeNL–furimazine showed that its luminescence peak falls within the range of optical transparency for chlorophyll and, therefore, enables greater penetration through a layer of cultured A. thaliana cells. Moreover, A. thaliana plants expressing GeNL with furimazine emitted strong luminescence, which could be detected even with the naked eye. Thus, the GeNL–furimazine combination should facilitate biological analyses of genes and cellular functions in A. thaliana and all other terrestrial plants.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0227477; 10.1371/journal.pone.0227477.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0227477.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0227477.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0227477.g004
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077392944&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227477; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31899919; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227477.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227477.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227477.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227477.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227477.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227477.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227477.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227477.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227477; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227477.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227477.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227477; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227477; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227477.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227477.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227477.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227477.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227477.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227477.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227477&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know