Implementation of the WHO guideline on treatment of young infants with signs of possible serious bacterial infection when hospital referral is not feasible in rural Zaria, Nigeria: Challenges and solutions
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 15, Issue: 3, Page: e0228718
2020
- 30Citations
- 93Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations30
- Citation Indexes29
- 28
- Policy Citations1
- 1
- Captures93
- Readers93
- 93
Article Description
Background Bacterial infection is one of the leading causes of mortality in young infants globally. The standard practice to manage young infants with any sign of possible serious bacterial infection (PSBI) is in a hospital setting with parenteral antibiotics, which may not be feasible for majority of cases in most low resource settings. The World Health Organization developed a guideline on management of PSBI in young infants when referral is not feasible in 2016. Methods We conducted implementation research in selected communities in Zaria Local Government Areas of Kaduna State with an estimated population of 50,000 with the aim of understanding how to implement the WHO PSBI treatment guideline to achieve high coverage with low case fatality and treatment failure rates. Implementation was within the programmatic settings using existing health structure. We conducted policy dialogue with decision makers to adapt the recommendations to their social, cultural and programmatic context in Nigeria, held orientation meetings with program managers, built capacity of the health workers and supported the implementation within the health system. We supported a non-government organization to conduct community sensitization to promote care seeking and adherence to treatment advice. The research team collected data systematically on all young infants identified to have PSBI, the treatment they received and the clinical outcome. Results Between April 2016 and March 2017, we identified 347 young infants up to 2 months of age with signs of PSBI who received treatment either as an outpatient or in a hospital among 2,154 births in the study population. The coverage of PSBI treatment in the study area was 95.5% assuming that 10% of all births have an episode of PSBI in the first two months of life. Most (89%) sick young infants with PSBI were identified by the community-oriented resource persons and sent to the Primary Health Care Centres (PHCs). Most families (97%) refused referral and were treated at a primary health care centre on outpatient basis. There were 12 deaths (3.5%) and 17 non-death treatment failures (4.9%) in 343 infants in whom an outcome could be ascertained. While non-death treatment failure rate was highest in 0-6-day infants with fast breathing (14.4%), case fatality was highest in those with signs of critical illness (20%). Conclusion We have demonstrated that outpatient treatment strategy for young infants with PSBI when referral is not feasible is implementable within the programmatic settings, achieving very high population coverage and relatively low treatment failure and case fatality rates. Implementation at scale will require government’s commitment to strengthen the health system with trained, motivated health care providers and necessary commodities.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0228718; 10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.t001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85081238797&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32155155; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0228718; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0228718.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0228718&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know