Combining ensemble models and connectivity analyses to predict wolf expected dispersal routes through a lowland corridor
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 15, Issue: 2, Page: e0229261
2020
- 21Citations
- 43Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations21
- Citation Indexes21
- 21
- Captures43
- Readers43
- 43
Article Description
The Italian wolf (Canis lupus italicus) population has remained isolated South of the Alps for the last few thousand years. After a strong decline, the species has recolonized the Apennines and the Western Alps, while it is currently struggling to colonize the Eastern Alps. Recently, the species was detected in a lowland park connecting the Northern Apennines to the Central Alps. If the park was able to sustain a net wolf dispersal flow, this could significantly boost the connection with the Eastern Alps and the Dinaric-Balkan population. We investigated the suitability of the park as a functional ecological corridor for the wolf through the unhospitable lowland of Northern Italy. We collected wolf occurrence data in two study areas. We modeled species distribution running a separate ensemble model for each study area and then merging the output of the models to obtain an integrated suitability map. We used this map to identify corridors for the wolf adopting a factorial least-cost path and a cumulative resistant kernel approach. The connectivity models showed that only two corridors exist in the lowland areas between the Northern Apennines and the Central Alps. The Western corridor is a blind route, while the eastern corridor passes through the park and has a continuous course. However, the models also revealed a scarce resilience of corridor connectivity in the passageways between the park and the Apennines and the Prealps, which suggests that urgent management actions are necessary to ensure the future functionality of this important corridor.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0229261; 10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.t004
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85079876733&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32092115; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.t004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.t004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0229261; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.t004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0229261.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0229261&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know