Effectiveness of kaolin-impregnated hemostatic gauze use in preperitoneal pelvic packing for patients with pelvic fractures and hemodynamic instability: A propensity score matching analysis
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 15, Issue: 7 July, Page: e0236645
2020
- 12Citations
- 21Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- Captures21
- Readers21
- 21
Article Description
Introduction: We evaluated the effectiveness of kaolin-impregnated hemostatic gauze use in preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP) for patients with hemodynamic instability due to severe pelvic fractures. Materials and methods: Between May 2014 and October 2018, 53 of 75 patients who underwent PPP due to hemodynamic instability induced by pelvic fracture were enrolled. Their medical records were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. QuikClot combat gauze (hydrophilic gauze impregnated with kaolin) and general surgical tape were used in 21 patients, while general surgical tape was used in the remaining 32 patients. Results: As there were differences in the characteristics of patients between the hemostatic gauze (HG) group and control group, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for age, sex, and lactate levels. After PSM, the clinical characteristics between the two groups became similar. There were no differences in the rates of mortality and hemorrhageinduced mortality between the two groups. However, the packed red blood cell (RBC) requirement for an additional 12 hours in the HG group was significantly lower than that in the control group (4.1 ± 3.5 vs. 7.6 ± 6.1 units, p = 0.035). The lengths of intensive care unit and hospital stays tended to be shorter in the HG group than in the control group (11.6 vs. 18.5 days, p = 0.1582; 30.8 vs. 47.4 days, p = 0.1861, respectively). Conclusions: The use of HG during PPP did not reduce hemorrhage-induced mortality, but did reduce the need for additional packed RBC transfusions in patients with hemodynamic instability due to severe pelvic fractures.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0236645; 10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85088679073&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236645; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32706824; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236645; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236645; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0236645; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0236645.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0236645&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know