BioPETsurv: Methodology and open source software to evaluate biomarkers for prognostic enrichment of time-to-event clinical trials
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 15, Issue: 9 September, Page: e0239486
2020
- 4Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- Captures8
- Readers8
Article Description
Biomarkers can be used to enrich a clinical trial for patients at higher risk for an outcome, a strategy termed "prognostic enrichment." Methodology is needed to evaluate biomarkers for prognostic enrichment of trials with time-to-event endpoints such as survival. Key considerations when considering prognostic enrichment include: clinical trial sample size; the number of patients one must screen to enroll the trial; and total patient screening costs and total per-patient trial costs. The Biomarker Prognostic Enrichment Tool for Survival Outcomes (BioPETsurv) is a suite of methods for estimating these elements to evaluate a prognostic enrichment biomarker and/or plan a prognostically enriched clinical trial with a time-to-event primary endpoint. BioPETsurv allows investigators to analyze data on a candidate biomarker and potentially censored survival times. Alternatively, BioPETsurv can simulate data to match a particular clinical setting. BioPETsurv's data simulator enables investigators to explore the potential utility of a prognostic enrichment biomarker for their clinical setting. Results demonstrate that both modestly prognostic and strongly prognostic biomarkers can improve trial metrics such as reducing sample size or trial costs. In addition to the quantitative analysis provided by BioPETsurv, investigators should consider the generalizability of trial results and evaluate the ethics of trial eligibility criteria. BioPETsurv is freely available as a package for the R statistical computing platform, and as a webtool at www.prognosticenrichment.com/surv.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0239486; 10.1371/journal.pone.0239486.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0239486.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0239486.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0239486.t001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85091324083&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239486; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32946505; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239486; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239486.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239486.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239486.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239486.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239486.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239486.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239486.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239486.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239486.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239486.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239486.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239486.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239486; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239486; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239486.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239486.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239486.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239486.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239486&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know