The impact of functional medicine on patientreported outcomes in inflammatory arthritis: A retrospective study
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 15, Issue: 10 October, Page: e0240416
2020
- 9Citations
- 60Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef3
- Policy Citations1
- 1
- Captures60
- Readers60
- 60
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Real-World Outcomes: Inflammatory Arthritis Outcomes Better With Functional Medicine Add-On
With its focus on lifestyle factors such as diet, physical activity, and environment exposures, functional medicine may be a helpful adjunct for patients with inflammatory
Article Description
Background Despite treatment advances for inflammatory arthritis, a significant amount of patients fail to achieve remission. Other modifiable factors such as diet, physical activity and environmental exposures may be an important area of focus to help patients achieve disease remission and greater overall health. Functional medicine focuses on these lifestyle factors and may be an important adjunctive therapy. In this study, we examined the impact of functional medicine on patient-reported outcomes in patients with inflammatory arthritis. Materials and methods In this 12-week, retrospective study, patients with confirmed diagnoses of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) were treated according to guidelines from the American College of Rheumatology for RA or PSA respectively. Those in the functional medicine group underwent a functional medicine program adjunctive to the standard of care. Patient reported outcomes, such as PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) global physical health, mental health and pain scores were collected at baseline and 12 weeks. Multivariable statistical modeling was used to identify the impact of functional medicine on patient-reported outcomes. Results 318 patients were screened and 54 patients (mean age 52.9±11.3 years, females 74 (67.9%)), were included. Baseline characteristics were similar in both patient groups with the exception of PROMIS global physical health and pain (PROMIS global physical health score 43 2 ± 6 6 and 39 7 ± 8 7 and pain scores of 3 5 ± 1 9 and 5 2 ± 2 7 in the functional medicine group vs. standard of care group respectively). Using multivariable model to account for these differences, patients in the functional medicine group had a statistically significant reduction in pain (0.92, p-value = 0.007) and change in PROMIS physical health score (2 84, p-value = 0.001) as compared to the standard of care. Changes in PROMIS global mental health scores were also significant and were dependent on age and were greatest in those older than 55. Limitations Retrospective design, baseline difference in patient reported outcomes. Conclusions Functional medicine may have an important role as adjunctive therapy to improve patients' pain, physical and mental health in those who do not see improvement with conventional therapy alone.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0240416; 10.1371/journal.pone.0240416.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0240416.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0240416.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0240416.t002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85092685035&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240416; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33031458; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240416.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240416.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240416.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240416.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240416.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240416.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240416.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240416.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240416; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240416.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240416.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240416; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240416; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240416.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240416.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240416.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240416.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240416.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240416.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240416&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know