Coxiella burnetii in slaughterhouses in Brazil: A public health concern
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 15, Issue: 10 October, Page: e0241246
2020
- 20Citations
- 53Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations20
- Citation Indexes20
- 20
- CrossRef7
- Captures53
- Readers53
- 53
Article Description
Q fever is an important zoonosis, yet it is often neglected and can present large outbreaks, as observed in the Netherlands. In the past few years, cases of Q fever have been described in Brazil; however, the epidemiological situation of Q fever in ruminants, the main reservoir of the pathogen, is unknown in this country. Our study aimed to estimate the prevalence of C. burnetii in cattle sent to slaughterhouses using an immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). From 1515 cattle serum samples collected from nine slaughterhouses, 23.8% (360/1515) were serologically positive by IFA (cutoff titer>1:64), indicating past or recent exposure to C. burnetii infection. Among the 54 cities sampled during the study, 83.3% (45/54) had at least one seropositive animal. Subsequently, all seropositive samples were submitted to qPCR for C. burnetii DNA, and 12.2% (44/360) of the sera were qPCR positive, which indicates bacteremia and suggests active or recent infection. The results highlight the risk for abattoir workers that results from exposure to contaminated aerosols produced during slaughter procedures. Moreover, the heat maps that were construction from the positive samples demonstrate the widespread distribution of C. burnetii in the State of São Paulo, Brazil and denotes the need for surveillance and preventive measures to reduce the prevalence in cattle.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0241246; 10.1371/journal.pone.0241246.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0241246.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0241246.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0241246.t001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85094934337&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241246; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33125388; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241246.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241246.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241246.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241246.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241246.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241246.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241246; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241246.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241246.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241246.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0241246.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241246.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0241246.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241246; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0241246; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241246.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0241246.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241246.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0241246.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0241246&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know