Planning priority conservation areas for biodiversity under climate change in topographically complex areas: A case study in Sichuan province, China
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 15, Issue: 12 December, Page: e0243425
2021
- 5Citations
- 30Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- Captures30
- Readers30
- 30
Article Description
Identifying priority conservation areas plays a significant role in conserving biodiversity under climate change, but uncertainties create challenges for conservation planning. To reduce uncertainties in the conservation planning framework, we developed an adaptation index to assess the effect of topographic complexity on species adaptation to climate change, which was incorporated into the conservation framework as conservation costs. Meanwhile, the species distributions were predicted by the Maxent model, and the priority conservation areas were optimized during different periods in Sichuan province by the Marxan model. Our results showed that the effect of topographic complexity was critical for species adaptation, but the adaptation index decreased with the temperature increase. Based on the conservation targets and costs, the distributions of priority conservation areas were mainly concentrated in mountainous areas around the Sichuan Basin where may be robust to the adaptation to climate change. In the future, the distributions of priority conservation areas had no evident changes, accounting for about 26% and 28% of the study areas. Moreover, most species habitats could be conserved in terms of conservation targets in these priority conservation areas. Therefore, our approach could achieve biodiversity conservation goals and be highly practical. More importantly, quantifying the effect of topography also is critical for options for planning conservation areas in response to climate change.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0243425; 10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g007; 10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g006; 10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85099066397&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33362279; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g007; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g007; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0243425; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0243425.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0243425&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know