PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Three dimensional cultivation increases chemo- And radioresistance of colorectal cancer cell lines

PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 16, Issue: 1 January, Page: e0244513
2021
  • 32
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 75
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 2
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Article Description

Although 2D cell cultures are commonly used to predict therapy response, it has become clear that 3D cultures may better mimic the in vivo situation and offer the possibility of tailoring translational clinical approaches. Here, we compared the response of 2D and 3D colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines to irradiation and chemotherapy. Classic 2D cultures and 3D spheroids of CRC cell lines (CaCo2, Colo205, HCT116, SW480) were thoroughly established, then irradiated with doses of 1, 4, or 10 Gy, using a clinical-grade linear accelerator. The response was assessed by immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and TUNEL assays. Upon irradiation, CRC 3D spheroids were morphologically altered. After irradiation with 10 Gy, annexin V/PI staining revealed a 1.8- to 4-fold increase in the apoptosis rate in the 2D cell cultures (95% CI 3.24±0.96), and a 1.5- to 2.4-fold increase in the 3D spheroids (95% CI 1.56±0.41). Irradiation with 1 Gy caused 3- and 4-fold increases in TUNEL positive cells in the CaCo2 and HCT116 (p = 0.01) 2D cultures, respectively, compared with a 2-fold increase in the 3D spheroids. Furthermore, the 2D and 3D cultures responded differently to chemotherapy; the 3D cultures were more resistant to 5-FU and cisplatin, but not to doxorubicin and mitomycin C, than the 2D cultures. Taken together, CRC cells cultured as 3D spheroids displayed markedly higher resistance to irradiation therapy and selected chemotherapeutic drugs than 2D cultures. This in vitro difference must be considered in future approaches for determining the ideal in vitro systems that mimic human disease.

Bibliographic Details

http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85099331914&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244513; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33395433; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244513; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244513; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0244513; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0244513.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0244513&type=printable

Jana Koch; Dina Mönch; Annika Maaß; Christian Gromoll; Thomas Hehr; Tobias Leibold; Hans J. Schlitt; Marc-H. Dahlke; Philipp Renner; Arun Rishi

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Multidisciplinary

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know