The effect of antenatal care on perinatal outcomes in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 16, Issue: 1 January, Page: e0245003
2021
- 33Citations
- 281Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations33
- Citation Indexes33
- 33
- CrossRef29
- Captures281
- Readers281
- 280
Review Description
Background The estimated annual global perinatal and neonatal death is four million. Stillbirths are almost equivalent to neonatal mortality, yet they have not received the same attention. Antenatal care is generally thought to be an effective method of improving pregnancy outcomes, but its effectiveness as a means of reducing perinatal mortality has not been evaluated in Ethiopia. Therefore, we will identify the pooled effect of antenatal care on perinatal outcomes in Ethiopia. Methods Medline, Embase, Cinahl, African journal online and Google Scholar was searched for articles published in English language between January 1990 and May 2020. Two independent assessors selected studies and extracted data from eligible articles. The Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-Randomized Studies was used to assess the quality of each included study. Data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed using I test statistical significance and Egger’s test for small-study effects respectively. The random effect model was employed, and forest plot was used to present the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Thirteen out of seventeen included studies revealed antenatal care utilization had a significant association with perinatal outcomes. The pooled risk ratio by the random-effects model for perinatal death was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.34, 0.52); stillbirth 0.34 (95% CI: 0.25, 0.46); early neonatal death 0.85 (95% CI: 0.21. 3.49). Conclusion Women who attended at least one antenatal care visit were more likely to give birth to an alive neonate that survives compared to their counterpart. Therefore, the Ethiopian Ministry of health and other stakeholders should design tailored interventions to increase antenatal care utilization since it has been shown to reduce perinatal mortality.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0245003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.t003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85099877138&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245003; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33444374; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245003.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245003&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know