The application of WHO ICD-PM: Feasibility for the classification of timing and causes of perinatal deaths in a busy birth centre in a low-income country
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 16, Issue: 1, Page: e0245196
2021
- 7Citations
- 53Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- Captures53
- Readers53
- 53
Article Description
Objective To assess the feasibility of the application of International Classification of Diseases-10—to perinatal mortality (ICD-PM) in a busy low-income referral hospital and determine the timing and causes of perinatal deaths, and associated maternal conditions. Design Prospective application of ICD-PM. Setting Referral hospital of Mnazi Mmoja Hospital, Zanzibar, United Republic of Tanzania. Population Stillbirths and neonatal deaths with a birth weight above 1000 grams born between October 16 2017 to May 31 2018. Methods Clinical information and an adapted WHO ICD-PM interactive excel-based system were used to capture and classify the deaths according to timing, causes and associated maternal complications. Descriptive analysis was performed. Main outcome measures Timing and causes of perinatal mortality and their associated maternal conditions. Results There were 661 perinatal deaths of which 248 (37.5%) were neonatal deaths and 413 (62.5%) stillbirths. Of the stillbirths, 128 (31%) occurred antepartum, 129 (31%) intrapartum and for 156 (38%) the timing was unknown. Half (n = 64/128) of the antepartum stillbirths were unexplained. Two-thirds (67%, n = 87/129) of intrapartum stillbirths followed acute intrapartum events, and 30% (39/129) were unexplained. Of the neonatal deaths, 40% died after complications of intrapartum events. Conclusion Problems of documentation, lack of perinatal death audits, capacity for investigations, and guidelines for the unambiguous objective assignment of timing and primary causes of death are major threats for accurate determination of timing and specific primary causes of perinatal deaths.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0245196; 10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.t002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85099917772&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245196; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33444424; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245196; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245196; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245196; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245196.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245196&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know