A pre-training and self-training approach for biomedical named entity recognition
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 16, Issue: 2 February, Page: e0246310
2021
- 33Citations
- 79Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations33
- Citation Indexes33
- 33
- CrossRef20
- Captures79
- Readers79
- 79
Article Description
Named entity recognition (NER) is a key component of many scientific literature mining tasks, such as information retrieval, information extraction, and question answering; however, many modern approaches require large amounts of labeled training data in order to be effective. This severely limits the effectiveness of NER models in applications where expert annotations are difficult and expensive to obtain. In this work, we explore the effectiveness of transfer learning and semi-supervised self-training to improve the performance of NER models in biomedical settings with very limited labeled data (250-2000 labeled samples). We first pre-train a BiLSTM-CRF and a BERT model on a very large general biomedical NER corpus such as MedMentions or Semantic Medline, and then we fine-tune the model on a more specific target NER task that has very limited training data; finally, we apply semisupervised self-training using unlabeled data to further boost model performance. We show that in NER tasks that focus on common biomedical entity types such as those in the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), combining transfer learning with self-training enables a NER model such as a BiLSTM-CRF or BERT to obtain similar performance with the same model trained on 3x-8x the amount of labeled data. We further show that our approach can also boost performance in a low-resource application where entities types are more rare and not specifically covered in UMLS.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0246310; 10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t010; 10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t007; 10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t008; 10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t009; 10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t006; 10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t005
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85101306887&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33561139; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t010; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t010; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t007; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t008; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t008; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t009; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t009; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t007; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t010; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t010; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246310; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t009; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t009; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t008; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246310.t008; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246310&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know