PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Investigating the association between diabetes and carpal tunnel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis approach

PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 19, Issue: 4, Page: e0299442
2024
  • 0
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 21
    Captures
  • 5
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Captures
    21
  • Mentions
    5
    • News Mentions
      5
      • 5

Most Recent News

People with diabetes at significantly higher risk of developing carpal tunnel syndrome, finds study

People with diabetes are at significantly higher risk of developing carpal tunnel syndrome, according to a study published in PlosOne. In recent years, several studies

Article Description

Introduction In recent years, several studies have reported on the relationship between diabetes and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, due to their contradictory results, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to investigate this subject. Methods This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published in ISI Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Embase databases. Heterogeneity in the studies included in the meta-analysis was evaluated using statistical tests such as the Chi-square test, I, and forest plots. Publication bias was assessed using Begg’s and Egger’s tests. Results This investigation analyzed data from 42 studies conducted between 1985 and 2022, with a total of 3,377,816 participants. The meta-analysis demonstrated that the odds ratio (OR) of CTS in participants with a history of diabetes compared to those without was 1.90 (95% CI: 1.64–2.21; P-value < 0.001). Given that publication bias was observed in this study (Begg’s test P-value = 0.01), the modified OR was calculated with consideration of missed studies, which was 1.68 (95% CI: 1.45–1.94; P-value < 0.001). Conclusion The results of this study suggest that diabetic patients have 90% higher odds of developing CTS compared to non-diabetic individuals, which is statistically significant.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know