Misinterpretation of Osteodensitometry With High Bone Density
Journal of Clinical Densitometry, ISSN: 1094-6950, Vol: 8, Issue: 1, Page: 1-6
2005
- 44Citations
- 17Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations44
- Citation Indexes44
- 44
- CrossRef41
- Captures17
- Readers17
- 17
Article Description
Osteodensitometry is increasingly used to identify low bone density resulting from osteoporosis. The universally accepted World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for assessing bone mineral density (BMD) contrasts individual T-scores to peak BMD in healthy adult control populations. In this scheme, “osteoporosis” refers arbitrarily to T-values below −2.5, “osteopenia” to values between −1.0 and −2.5, and “normal” to values above −1.0. Although individually rare, numerous conditions cause supranormal BMD in children and adults. Increasingly, elevated BMD is detected by osteodensitometry, especially dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Illustrated here, the absence of upper limits for BMD in the WHO criteria jeopardizes recognition of high-BMD disease for all age groups. This oversight requires correction using Z-scores.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094695006602989; http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/jcd:8:1:001; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=15244364126&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15722580; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1094695006602989; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1094695006602989; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1094695006602989?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1094695006602989?httpAccept=text/plain; http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/jcd%3A8%3A1%3A001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1385/jcd%3A8%3A1%3A001
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know